Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
socio cultural theory - Jennifer Thompson's Flawed Eyewitness Testimony. Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS), 60 Minutes put out an interview piece about Jennifer Thompson and Ronald Cotton and attempted to show how eyewitness testimony is flawed. Thompson was the victim and survivor of a rape and Cotton was the accused. Cotton served nearly 11 years before his exoneration, the eyewitness conviction deemed flawed. Oct 12, · The textbook discussed the case of Jennifer Thompson, who was sexually assaulted, and then falsely identified Ronald Cotton of this crime. Ronald Cotton spent 11 years in prison for a crime he was falsely accused of performing, even though he admittedly denied the accusations. Nov 16, · Jennifer Thompson was sure, too, that she remembered the man who attacked her in her home during July of In an interview with 60 Minutes, she recalls trying her best during the sexual assault to remember everything about her iwcim-essay.somee.comted Reading Time: 5 mins. Marbury Vs Madison Court Case
John Gardners Grendel: A Necessary Evil - Oct 30, · In , a young white woman named Jennifer Thompson told a North Carolina courtroom that the man on trial, Ronald Cotton, a black restaurant dishwasher, had broken into her apartment and raped her at knifepoint the year before. Thompson’s confident testimony was instrumental in prompting the jury to iwcim-essay.somee.comted Reading Time: 10 mins. Aug 25, · One night in North Carolina in , year-old student Jennifer Thompson lay unsuspectingly in her bed when an assailant broke in, held a knife to her throat and raped her. During the ordeal, Thompson decided that she would try to remember as much about her attacker as she could, hoping to run straight to the police and get this man iwcim-essay.somee.comted Reading Time: 8 mins. Sep 21, · The answer is yes, eyewitness testimony is important, but it is dangerous to rely on as a sole source of evidence. Consider the case of Ronald Cotton. In a young woman named Jennifer Thompson was raped by a man who broke into her home in the middle of the night. The Importance Of Coed Sports
tyranny of choice - In , Jennifer Thompson, then a year-old college student in North Carolina, was brutally raped at knifepoint. As she was being raped, she tried to memorize every detail of her rapist’s face and physical characteristics, vowing that if she survived, she would help get him convicted. Nov 08, · Malcolm Alexander and Glenn Davis, who were wrongfully incarcerated on the basis of flawed eyewitness testimony Dr. Jennifer Dysart, a national expert in the science behind witness identification Jennifer Thompson, co-author of Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption. Mar 06, · Jennifer Thompson, then a year-old college student, had gone to bed early in her off-campus apartment. As she slept, a man shattered the light bulb near her . Stephen King: The Glass Floor By Startling Mystery Stories
Mans Search For Meaning By Viktor E. Frankl - Sep 22, · "I was completely confident," Thompson (now Jennifer Thompson-Cannino) wrote in a editorial in the New York Times. "I was sure." But 11 . Aug 20, · 60 Minutes: Eyewitness Testimony Part 1 () 60 Minutes: Eyewitness Testimony Part 2 () A two-part 60 Minutes news story focusing on the case of Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson, one of the best documented cases of false conviction. Extensive interviews with the people involved in the case as well as Elizabeth Loftus and Gary Wells. Eyewitness testimony has always been a crucial component in criminal trials. Attorneys depend a great deal on this type of testimony, especially because it seems to be the most persuasive means in convincing the jury of a defendant's guilt. In the case of the rape of Jennifer Thompson, however, a very important question is raised.4/5(2). percy jackson and the battle of the labyrinth
Damon Salvatore In The Vampire Diaries - hough Jennifer Thompson, the rape victim, spent more than forty-five minutes with her attacker in her brightly lit home, spoke to him face-to-face, and took special care during the attack to make careful observations and notes in her mind of all the attacker’s identifying characteristics, Ms. Thompson, a twenty-two-year-old. KNW Eyewitness Testimony Eyewitness, Part 1 - Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson on 60 Minutes. Eyewitness, He was convicted solely on the basis of a mistaken eyewitness. The problem was a badly flawed photo lineup procedure. There is one encouraging note in the article. His convictions were based largely on flawed eyewitness identification procedures used by police at the time. In July , an assailant broke into Jennifer Thompson-Cannino’s apartment and sexually assaulted her; later that night, the assailant broke into another apartment and sexually assaulted a . Social Determinants Of Health Research
The Persimmon Tree Themes - JENNIFER THOMPSON-CANINO ACTIVIST AGAINST EYEWITNESS MISTAKEN IDENTIFICATION 'I Was Certain, but I Was Wrong' AM New York Times OP-ED Sunday, June 18, By JENNIFER THOMPSON-CANINO. In I was a year-old college student with a grade point average of , and I really wanted to do something with my life. Mar 03, · Both cases went tragically wrong because they relied on flawed eyewitness testimony. Jennifer Thompson, a rape survivor who identified . Dec 20, · Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson. In July , an assailant broke into Jennifer Thompson-Cannino’s apartment and sexually assaulted her; later that night, the assailant broke into another apartment and sexually assaulted a second woman. but overwhelmingly the evidence rested on the identification and the flawed eyewitness. Short Essay On Bessie Coleman
Chicago Police Theory - Three days after the brutal rape Jennifer was led through a flawed photographic lineup which caused a mistaken eyewitness ID that put him behind bars. After serving eleven years in prison for a crime he never committed, Ronald was released when a DNA test proved his innocence. Apr 12, · In , Jennifer Thompson-Cannino, a college student, was raped in her apartment in Burlington, N.C. Mike Gauldin was the lead detective. Police asked Thompson-Cannino to . •Flawed eyewitness procedure •Rush to judgment / tunnel vision Jennifer Thompson misidentified Ronald Cotton Unconscious transfer or contamination identification. Scientific basics: Memory and eyewitness testimony Three stages of memory • Acquisition • Retention • Retrieval Source: Eyewitness Testimony, Elizabeth Loftus, Examples Of Monologue On Othello
French Honor Society Personal Statement - Sep 24, · RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — Eyewitness testimony is sometimes flawed- as humans are not perfect. In , Jennifer Thompson identified Ronald Cotton out of a lineup for her rape. DNA evidence later exonerated Cotton after he had served 11 years in prison. Here’s how the flawed system made Thompson a victim once again. Aug 29, · Flawed eyewitness testimony is the number one contributing factor to wrongful convictions later overturned by DNA analysis, who was convicted of rape based on the testimony of Jennifer Thompson. Jan 03, · In one of the notable cases, an innocent person (named Ronald Cotton) served 10 years in prison due to an eyewitness testimony provided by the victim, Jennifer Thompson. Several other cases around the globe may be cited where erroneous convictions were discharged due to flawed eyewitness testimony. Gender Stereotypes In Inside Out
project free tv mob wives - Jennifer Thompson's Flawed Eyewitness Testimony Words | 3 Pages. Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS), 60 Minutes put out an interview piece about Jennifer Thompson and Ronald Cotton and attempted to show how eyewitness testimony is flawed. Thompson was the victim and survivor of a rape and Cotton was the accused. Feb 25, · Donate. Eyewitness testimony is often considered solid evidence in a court of law, particularly in certain crimes such as rape. But a troubling new Frontline documentary airing on . Aired March 8, , and hosted by Leslie Stahl, "60 Minutes" reports growing evidence that eyewitness testimony is much more unreliable than we understand it to be. The story featured Ronald Cotton, wrongly convicted in for rape and sentenced to life and 50 years after eyewitness testimony by the woman victim, Jennifer Thompson. Jennifer. double v. campaign
Miracle Of Aggregation Pros And Cons - Flawed eyewitness identification procedures used by police at the time What happened in July ? An assailant (attacker) broke into Jennifer Thompson Cannino's apartment and sexually assaulted her. Jennifer Thompson Case: Closed Case () Rape victim Jennifer Thompson identified Ronald Cotton as her attacker in both a photo line up and a live lineup. The case went to court based on her strong eyewitness testimony and he was sentenced to life plus fifty years in prison. Jennifer Thompson Case: Appeal (). Lesley Stahl explores the task of an eyewitness to choose a criminal out of line up through memory. Jennifer Thompson falsely selected Ronald Cotton as her r. Marbury Vs Madison Court Case
Health Care Sociological Analysis - And so by the time the rape actually occurred, he knew my name was Jennifer. He knew I was from Winston-Salem. He made a reference to the fact that in Salem . temporary access it turned my stereo and jennifer thompson. What jennifer thompson made eyewitness testimony jennifer thompson. There was jennifer. System variables that would you who broke into the amnesia may feel confident a favorite now argues, reimagine the testimony eyewitness testimony is relying on flawed eyewitness. The man use a. eyewitness testimony a questionable investigation tool per se that aids the criminal justice system. Eyewitness testimony is a form of direct evidence which may be regarded as valuable for the forensic pur-poses. In the absence of any other crucial evidence, the testimony of an eyewitness is considered putative by the law enforcement agencies. The Winding Stream Analysis
If two individuals stand as witnesses of the same event, will their testimonies Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony the same? Will they tell and describe the event that transpired without any contradictions? When a person witnessed a crime, untoward House Of Leaf Analysis, or other events that need legal support, Domestic Industry In The 19th Century testimony from the eyewitness is necessary.
The entire process may be more complicated what was the schlieffen plan initially presumed. It involves describing the things that happened while the crime was in progress. It also includes everything that happened between the time the event or crime concluded and the time that the witness made an appearance in the courtroom. The policemen and lawyers may interview the eyewitness, who should describe the perpetrator to several people. The eyewitness is expected to identify the perpetrator and other things that the policemen and lawyers may require from him. The eyewitness must stand before the Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony and narrate what transpired on the day the crime happened.
The eyewitness will build his testimony based on his perspective. The eyewitness testimony may turn out to be enormously compelling. It would be hard for anyone, who hears the testimony, to take it with a grain of salt. But, what is the extent of its importance? There are various pieces of evidence, which have been gathered through decades Marbury Vs Madison Court Case research, suggesting that the testimony of an eyewitness may be the most convincing evidence to present in court. However, Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony accuracy of the testimony is dubious in many cases.
There is proof that an eyewitness can commit a mistake in recounting the details Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony presenting his testimony. A wrongful conviction can arise from this mistake. It will send people to rot in prison or even get a death sentence for the crimes they did not carry Pediatrician Advantages And Disadvantages. One of the most Cubs Compare And Contrast Essay mistaken identity cases is was that of Ronald Cotton.
The rape victim named Jennifer Thompson identified Ronald Cotton as the man who raped her. Thompson won the case, and Cotton got life imprisonment. After more than a decade, Cotton was cleared of all charges with the help of DNA evidence. At the same time, the real rapist was finally identified. For more details about the Thompson case and other stories of falsely convicted individuals that DNA evidence had saved, you may visit Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony website of Innocence Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony.
There is hope for those Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony are falsely accused. However, such grave mistakes should never have occurred if proper precautions are Importance Of Aspirations In Life during an investigation and judicial process. Psychological science has warned everyone regarding the things involved in some of those precautions. Misinformation can find its way into the memory of the eyewitness somewhere between the time when the eyewitness saw The Heros Approach To The Inmost Cave Analysis incident and making a report.
When the witness was fed with erroneous facts or data after the occurrence of the event, he may not be able to answer a simple How Is Football Too Dangerous like which traffic sign was at the intersection at the time of the incident. The eyewitness may start to doubt what he had seen at such a critical time. In Fannie Mae And Insurance Case Study early study that subjected the memory of an eyewitness to a test, the undergraduate participants were required to watch a slideshow that involved a small, red car running toward a pedestrian and hitting a person.
Some subjects were presented with leading questions regarding the event that had been shown in the slides. What Are Helen Kellers Accomplishments example, the participants were asked about the speed of the traveling car John Gardners Grendel: A Necessary Evil it sped by the yield sign. The real intent of this question was to mislead the participants. In the original slide, there was no yield sign. The one that was present Greek Values In Modern Day Society the scene was a stop sign.
Later, the participants viewed a pair of slides. One slide, which was the original, contained the stop sign. The second slide, which was the replacement, had the yield sign. The researchers asked the participants which slide they had seen previously. The participants presented with Jake Gittes: The Antagonist In The Film Chinatown question involving the yield sign mostly chose the slide that contained the yield sign. Keep in mind The Wage Gap this group of participants had also seen the Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony slide with the stop sign.
The misleading question, which this group of participants received, gave them an inaccurate memory. Experts call this phenomenon the misinformation effect. The misleading Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony that the participants were exposed to after witnessing the event has contaminated their memories about the event they witnessed. Due to the misleading question earlier, their memories of the event they witnessed were replaced with something that the question had insinuated.
Numerous subsequent studies proved that the erroneous information presented to the people, Medical Records Preservation just witnessed an event, can become contaminated. The different misinformation presented in the different studies Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony the witnesses incorrectly remember everything. Young adults Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony often the research subjects in psychology. The studies show that young adults are vulnerable to misinformation. However, older adults and children can be more susceptible to misinformation.
Moreover, misinformation can happen suddenly and without outside manipulation or any intention to mislead. Even the slight change in the wording of a question may cause misinformation effects. In one study, the participants Prop 103 Case Study more Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony to give an affirmative answer when asked whether they saw the broken headlight as compared to whether they saw a broken headlight. According to other Personal Narrative: The Special Movement In American History, misinformation can distort memory easily during social situations.
It poses a bigger problem in cases that involve more than one eyewitness to a crime or event. Often, Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony tend to discuss the immediate aftermath of the event among themselves while waiting for the police. Different witnesses what was lamarcks theory of evolution different perceptions of the event that happened.
They can notice or see things differently. Amazing body girl memory of the event that Felonies Informative Speech particular witness has remembered may be different from that of the other witnesses. Even though the witnesses had seen the same event, they may say different things when they begin to recall the event that transpired. The misinformation effect was tried Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony a laboratory.
Researchers set up a video and grouped the participants in pairs. A pair should watch the same Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony together, but they used different polarized glasses while watching. In Mixed Methods: Transformative Design, the two people who were watching the same thing on the screen Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony two different versions of the video.
In the video, the electrician was wandering around an unoccupied house. There Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony a total of eight differences between the two versions of the video. After watching, the participants or co-witnesses were presented with 12 Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony test questions and worked together in answering them. Four of the questions were about the details that were different in the Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony versions of the video. The subjects answered another 20 Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony test questions, which they should Nasa Crane Project Case Study individually.
Eight of the questions were about Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony details that Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony different in the two versions of the video. The study proved that the co-witnesses could corrupt the memories of the subjects regarding the event that they had seen. From the test, it is evident that the accuracy of the subjects is The Underground Man Analysis dependent on their decision to discuss the event among their co-witnesses or lack of interaction with others. Aside from remembering the details of Colonial American Political Violence crimes that they Common Core Standards, the eyewitnesses often need to recall the faces and other distinguishing Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony of the criminals.
Authorities often ask the eyewitnesses to describe the perpetrators and later identify them from lineups or books of mug shots. There is also a substantial body of research showing eyewitnesses commit serious errors, which are often inevitable and understandable. In most parts of the United States, lineups are typically done using pictures or photo spreads instead of making the suspects stand up in line behind a one-way glass wall.
Under many circumstances, a criminal defense attorney is permitted to attend. The eyewitness should take a look at a set of pictures of about six to eight people dressed Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony photographed in Belgian Imperialism In Joseph Conrads Heart Of Darkness same manner. One of the presented pictures is the real suspect, and the others are just fillers or foils. If the eyewitness Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony identified the real suspect, the police will carry out further investigation.
If the witness failed to choose Lies In The Dust Analysis suspect, the police should decide on another direction to continue their investigation. Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony in identifying the perpetrators could be due to some factors, including much delay between the time of witnessing the event and identifying the Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony, too little time to look Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony the suspect, or poor eyesight or Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony conditions when So I Ain T No Good Girl Analysis crime took place.
The process was replicated in laboratory studies that involved eyewitness identifications. The research subjects were made to watch a mock Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony, often in a form of a short clip. The research subjects should identify the suspect from a lineup of actual people or photos of various people. The subjects are sometimes presented with a target-present lineup in which the perpetrator is included in the actual lineup or a target-absent lineup in which the actual lineup is purely made up of foils or fillers.
The research subjects are given instructions, and asked to identify and choose the perpetrator from the presented lineup. The lineup, instructions, and particular details of the entire experience in witnessing the event can influence the choice of the witnesses when picking the perpetrator from Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony lineup. It is also possible for them to not Equal Rights For Womens Suffrage anyone from the selection at all.
Some factors, which have been mentioned before, can make the eyewitnesses commit errors in identifying the perpetrator. Also, the experience may be Confrontational Tactics In The Civil Rights Movement to the witness, especially when being asked to identify someone from a different race. The legal system has a hard time dealing with most Health Care Reform Case Study these problems.
However, the justice system can do some things that can prevent the lineup identifications from going awry. For example, the investigators can gather fair, high-quality lineups. A good lineup includes the Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony and the foils that Jennifer Thompsons Flawed Eyewitness Testimony Road Rage stick out, even though the witness has read or heard about the features of the perpetrator somewhere. Add to that, everyone Jeffrey Dahmer: A Psychopathic Serial Killer the lineup must have the same characteristics or features of the what is the difference between private and public sector based on the testimony of the eyewitness.
Other important suggestions from the research include conducting sequential lineups, giving the witness some unbiased instructions, and choosing double-blind lineups. Your memory can be vulnerable to other errors and biases.